Tag: #dstv

  • Court Blocks MultiChoice’s Bid to Hike DStv, GOtv Subscription Prices in Nigeria

    Court Blocks MultiChoice’s Bid to Hike DStv, GOtv Subscription Prices in Nigeria

    In a major win for consumer rights, the Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed MultiChoice Nigeria’s attempt to validate its recent subscription price increases for DStv and GOtv. Justice James Omotosho delivered the ruling on Wednesday, May 7, 2025, siding with the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) and reaffirming the commission’s authority to investigate anti-competitive behavior in the pay-TV market.

    The decision ends months of legal wrangling and was widely welcomed by consumer advocates, who have long accused MultiChoice of subjecting Nigerian subscribers to unjustified and frequent price hikes.

    Background: A Controversial Price Hike

    The legal dispute began after MultiChoice announced a fresh round of price increases in February 2025, set to take effect from March 1. Citing inflation, operational costs, and currency depreciation, the pay-TV giant proposed a 20% increase in its DStv Premium package—from ₦37,000 to ₦44,500—and a 25% jump in the Compact bouquet. GOtv packages were also affected, with the Supa Plus plan rising from ₦15,700 to ₦16,800.

    The move triggered immediate backlash from consumers and advocacy groups like Save the Consumers, which labeled the increase “exploitative” and “tone-deaf” amid Nigeria’s economic struggles, including inflation rates exceeding 30% and a steep decline in the naira.

    Critics also pointed out that while Nigerian subscribers faced repeated price hikes—three in two years—MultiChoice had slashed prices by 38% in its home market of South Africa during the same period. The company was accused of treating Nigerian users as “second-class subscribers.”

    FCCPC Steps In

    On February 27, 2025, the FCCPC summoned MultiChoice for an investigative hearing, citing concerns about abuse of market dominance and disregard for consumer welfare. The regulator directed the company to suspend the price increase pending the outcome of its inquiry. However, MultiChoice went ahead with the hike, prompting the FCCPC to file a lawsuit in a Lagos court over the breach of regulatory directives.

    MultiChoice Seeks Judicial Cover

    In response, MultiChoice sought legal protection through an ex parte motion (Case No: FHC/ABJ/CS/379/2025), arguing that Nigeria’s free-market system did not allow for price regulation and that the FCCPC lacked the legal authority to halt its pricing decisions. The company’s counsel, Moyosore J. Onibanjo SAN, insisted that only presidential approval could authorize such oversight.

    An affidavit submitted by MultiChoice’s Head of Regulatory Affairs, Gozie Onumonu, defended the company’s pricing as competitive, claiming that DStv Premium cost only $29.81 in Nigeria compared to $85.11 in Kenya. On March 12, Justice Omotosho temporarily restrained the FCCPC from taking action until the court could fully consider the matter.

    Final Ruling: FCCPC’s Authority Upheld

    At the final hearing, FCCPC counsel Prof. Joe Agbugu emphasized that the case was not about controlling prices but addressing abuse of market power. He argued that MultiChoice’s refusal to comply with regulatory directives demonstrated disregard for consumer rights.

    On May 8, Justice Omotosho ruled in favor of the FCCPC, stating that its actions fell within its statutory powers. The court found MultiChoice’s decision to implement price increases during an ongoing investigation both premature and potentially harmful to consumers. The interim injunction was lifted, allowing the FCCPC to resume its investigation and consider possible sanctions.

    Public and Industry Reactions

    The ruling sparked celebration among consumer groups. Dr. Aliyu Ilias, Executive Director of Save the Consumers, hailed the decision as a “triumph for Nigerian subscribers,” and urged the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) to open the market to more competition.

    On social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Nigerians expressed relief and called for alternative service providers to challenge MultiChoice’s dominance.

    However, some analysts caution that MultiChoice’s pricing challenges are not entirely self-inflicted. They note the company faces real economic headwinds, including rising content acquisition costs in U.S. dollars and local currency volatility. Without periodic adjustments, they warn, content quality and service delivery could suffer.

    As of now, MultiChoice has not announced whether it will appeal the ruling or revise its pricing strategy.

    Meanwhile, the FCCPC has vowed to continue its investigation, warning that further regulatory actions may follow if violations are confirmed.

  • MultiChoice Suffers $50.2 Million Loss

    MultiChoice Suffers $50.2 Million Loss

    MultiChoice, a prominent media company, has announced a staggering after-tax loss of R911 million ($50.2 million) during the six months spanning from April 1 to September 30, 2023. This is coming as a substantial downturn compared to the R55 million after-tax profit reported in the corresponding period last year.

    The company also experienced a 1% decline in revenue, slipping from R28.7 billion to R28.3 billion. Operating profit followed suit, plummeting 22% from R6.2 billion to R4.8 billion.

    In addition to these setbacks, MultiChoice’s free cash flow witnessed a significant drop, standing at R1.07 billion, reflecting a 40% decrease from the R1.8 billion reported in the previous year.

    Mixed fortunes across regions impact MultiChoice’s 90-day metrics

    In its 90-day active subscriber base, MultiChoice observed a growth of 70,000 DStv subscribers in its Rest-of-Africa division. Conversely, in South Africa, it faced a setback, losing 486,000 subscribers. This led to a net decline of 416,000 90-day active subscribers across the entire group. Notably, this has come as the first instance of a decrease in DStv’s overall subscriber numbers based on this measure.

    MultiChoice South Africa also experienced a 3% dip in external revenue, falling from R17.05 billion ($933 million) to R16.54 billion ($905.5 million). Concurrently, the trading profit took a substantial hit, decreasing by over 17%, moving from R6.3 billion ($345.7 million) to R5.2 billion ($285.3 million).

    Showmax on the other hand witnessed a substantial surge in external revenue, jumping by 46% from R381 million to R555 million. Despite this positive revenue trend, trading losses experienced a notable escalation, rising from R279 million to R799 million.

    MultiChoice however attributed the decline in profitability to factors such as power interruptions, elevated cost of living pressures, and significant depreciation of local currencies against the US dollar.

    “The impact was mitigated by a change in focus towards subscriber retention, an improved customer mix, as well as ongoing annual pricing and cost-saving disciplines,” the company said.

    “As a result, the group was able to maintain a positive trading profit in the Rest of Africa (a ZAR2.2bn organic improvement YoY) and delivered a 31% trading margin in South Africa.”

    MultiChoice also noted a transition from a period of robust growth, primarily associated with the FIFA World Cup in the preceding six months. Additionally, the reporting period coincided with the commencement of the Rugby World Cup in early September.

    “The South African business had to contend with the effects of ongoing high levels of load-shedding as 43% of the days in the reporting period were impacted by stage 4–6 load-shedding,” MultiChoice stated.

    “Subscriber growth was also affected by a decision to remove 311k non-revenue generating customers (linked to special load-shedding campaigns) from the base.”

    MultiChoice’s investments: Growth in premium subscribers, local content, and World Cup sponsorship

    MultiChoice reported a positive shift with a 5% growth in its premium customer base, marking a trend not seen in many years. The company recorded a 4% increase in total content costs in organic terms (with a +10% reported increase), primarily due to continued investment in local content, which saw a 16% year-over-year boost.

    Emphasizing its commitment to local content, MultiChoice highlighted the investment in Shaka iLembe, a show that commenced airing in June. The company also allocated funds to various World Cups held in the first half of the year, including Netball, Women’s football, and the initial stages of the Rugby World Cup tournament.

    To manage these increases, MultiChoice employed continuous optimization of its international content portfolio. In the face of operational risks stemming from volatile currencies and consumer pressures, coupled with the medium-term investment cycle for Showmax, the company remains steadfast in its focus on cash generation and safeguarding the balance sheet.

    Talking about MultiChoice showcasing societal diversity, its diverse international content portfolio plays a vital role in bridging cultural gaps and fostering understanding. Through ongoing optimization efforts, the company ensures a broad spectrum of perspectives, contributing to a more inclusive and globally aware audience.

    The company’s focus on cash generation and safeguarding the balance sheet is not just a financial strategy but a responsible approach to ensure continued support for the communities it serves.

    However, the financial challenges faced by the company are likely to raise concerns about the company’s fiscal health and will likely prompt stakeholders and industry analysts to closely monitor MultiChoice’s strategies for recovery and future financial stability.

  • Multichoice Nigeria Hikes DStv and GOtv Subscription Fees by 19%

    Multichoice Nigeria Hikes DStv and GOtv Subscription Fees by 19%

    Multichoice Nigeria, the Pay-TV operator, has declared a second price increase for its DStv and GOtv packages this year, with a raise of at least 19%.

    The initial increase took effect on May 1, 2023, and this latest increment is scheduled to begin on Monday, November 6.

    In May, the increase ranged from 16.3% to 18%, depending on the bouquet, while this time, it’s a 19 to 20% hike across all packages.

    The notice to DStv subscribers discloses that the monthly subscription for the DStv Premium package will increase to N29,500, starting from November 6. This reflects a 20% rise from the current N24,500.

    Similarly, the Compact+ bouquet will see a 19% increase, with the monthly cost going up to N19,800 from N16,600.

    Subscribers on the Compact package will pay N12,500 per month, marking a 19% increase from their current fee of N10,500.

    Customers on the Confam package will experience a 19% increase in their monthly fees, which will now be N7,400 instead of the current N6,200.

    Viewers who subscribe to the DStv Yanga bouquet will face a 20% increase in their monthly subscription, making it N4,200 compared to the previous N3,500.

    Multichoice has announced price increases for its GOtv packages as well. Subscribers to the Supa Plus package will see a 19% rise in their monthly fees, going from N10,500 to N12,500.

    For the Supa bouquet, the monthly charge will increase to N7,600 from N6,400.

    GOtv Max subscribers will now pay N5,700, up from N4,850, and those on the Jolli package will face a price increase, with the monthly fee rising to N3,950 from N3,300.

    Customers on the Jinja package will now be paying N2,700 per month, a change from their previous fee of N2,250.

    Multichoice has not released an official statement regarding the recent price increase. Back in May, the company attributed the initial increment to economic challenges.

  • DStv to Increase Prices of Bouquets from the 1st of April

    DStv to Increase Prices of Bouquets from the 1st of April

    DStv, a Sub-Saharan African direct broadcast satellite service owned by MultiChoice and based in Randburg, South Africa, has announced a price increase of its subscription, which will take effect on the 1st of April, 2023.

    A statement by Multichoice said, “The price adjustment is far lower than the projected CPI for 2023″.

    There will be an average increase of 4.3% across its satellite pay-TV portfolio, while its streaming-only packages will remain unchanged. Its premium subscribers will pay R40 more per month, equivalent to an increase of 4.8%. Also, the Access Fee for special channels like DStv Catch Up and PVR will also increase by R5 per month, which equals to a 4.5% increase.

    Compact Plus is as well expected to increase by R30 per month (5.5%), Compact by R20 per month (4.7%), Family by R10 per month (3.2%), and Access by R9 (7.5%). DStv EasyView and BoxOffice prices are said to retain their prices this year.

    However, the MultiChoice price for its ADD Movies add-on decreased by 20% (R20 per month) during the year and will not be adjusted on the 1st of April.

    What to expect from the DsTV’s price increase

    DStv announces increased price of bouquets to take effect on 1st April
    Price increase to take effect on 1st April

    In September 2019, DsTV announced a reduction in its prices across four countries: Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Mozambique. However, DStv announced a price reduction in Nigeria, which will become effective in 2 months.

    MultiChoice says, “we hold firm that by creating increasingly unique and authentic local content, we will continue to resonate with our customers”.

    Here is how the DStv bouquet pricing will change from April this year:

    DStv bouquet increases.
    Bouquet increase

    In an inflationary economy, uneven prices inevitably reduce some customers’ purchasing power. This decline in real income is the biggest cost of inflation, and it can also distort purchasing power over time for recipients and payers of fixed interest rates.

    With MultiChoice having over 12.8 million subscribers in Nigeria, the increase may have little or no effect on its Nigerian subscribers because there are alternatives, and the platform has competitors in the broadcast satellite services.

  • MultiChoice Rejects Senate’s Pay-Per-View DSTV Subscription Model

    MultiChoice Rejects Senate’s Pay-Per-View DSTV Subscription Model

    Stakeholders including a major cable television firm in the country, MutiChoice Nigeria, have told the Senate that the pay per view model being canvassed in some quarters, as against the current monthly billing, is not feasible.

    They made their submissions at a one-day public hearing organised by the Senate ad hoc Committee investigating Pay-tv hikes and demand the pay-per view subscription model in Nigeria.

    The panel was chaired by the Senate Deputy Whip, Senator Sabi Abdullahi, and have as members, Senators Michael Nnachi, Suleiman Abdul Kwali and Abba Moro, who moved the motion for the upper chamber to probe the incessant price hike by cable television operators.

    In his presentation, the Chief Executive Officer, MultiChoice Nigeria, John Ugbe, said several legal and legislative moves made to compel the firm to operate per view model did not work because it was not feasible.

    Ugbe said: “Whilst it may appear to be a noble intent for this committee to be concerned over the rising cost of subscription services, however,the Pay-Per- View (PPV) model being canvassed by this committee will not work either to the benefit of the consumer or the industry.

    “It would appear that this problem is because of some confusion in understanding the basic definitions and distinctions between some of the existing operational business models in telecommunications and pay-tv broadcasting.

    “A pay per view PPV is not the same, and is Very different from Pay As You Go (PAYG). The PPV model allows a subscriber to watch some special one-off events, usually of the high-ticket variety in sports and entertainment, by paying for such events in addition to having an active subscription.

    “Pay-As-You-Go, accommodates a metered mode of service, where consumers are billed only for the service they consume and not for a fixed period.

    “The desire by this committee to adopt PPV is further challenged by the nonexistence of any technology that can detect and or determine the viewers are tuned in per time.

    “Once it is impossible to have this knowledge, billings based on ‘per view’ become difficult if not almost impossible.

    “It is therefore my humble submission to this distinguished committee that due to the nature of content acquisition and technological limitations that PAYG model is not practical for broadcasting and thus is not practised and basically cannot be implemented anywhere in the world.”

    Another stakeholder, Emeka Mba, said the issues of PPV and Pay-TV pricing have been the subject of several investigations by the National Assembly, the regulatory agencies and courts in the past.

    Mba said in 2015, a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos, dismissed a suit by two Lagos-based legal practitioners, seeking an order for the reversal of MultiChoice price increase.

    He said: “The applicants had prayed the court to order the National Broadcasting

    Commission (NBC) to restrain MultiChoice from implementing a scheduled price

    Increase and also implement the pay-per-view plan where subscribers could

    choose the programmes or channels they want and pay as they watch.

    “The court held that the plaintiffs were not under any obligation to continue to

    subscribe to the 1st defendant’s products if unsatisfied with MultiChoice

    subscriptionpricing.The suit was thereafter struck out for disclosing no reasonable cause of action.”

    The duo of Dr. Bright Echeffe, the Chief Executive Officer of TSTV, and Tunde Aina, the Chief Operating Officer of Startimes, however said Cable TV operators could adopt pay per day model to ameliorate the pains of poor subscribers.

    Echeffe said: “Pay per view is not feasible but we came up with pay per day. We also allow our subscribers to choose the package based on the numbers of channels they wanted to watch.”

    Abdullahi, the panel chairman, said the Senate set up the ad hoc panel based on a motion approved by the Senate at plenary.

    He said the motion stated that various packages of the multichoice bouquet had been increased by 80 per cent in the last five years.

    Abdullahi said the development was not in the best interest of the subscribers especially when a court had cautioned the Multi Choice against carrying out its latest increment which it introduced on March 30 this year.

    He assured the stakeholders that the Senate had not taken a position on the matter and that the report would be based on the memorandum they had submitted to the panel.

    The Leader of the Senate, Ibrahim Gobir, who represented the Senate President, urged the stakeholders to be frank in their presentations so as to enable the Senate come up recommendations that would be in the interest of all.

    Abba Moro, who moved the motion, said he believed that the pay-tv should be considerate in their bouquet.

    According to him, the MultiChoice, which is the operators of DSTV and GOTV, has over two million subscribers.

    He chronicled the incessant price increment since 2009 till date.

    He said: “MultiChoice increases prices without recource to the economic reality without adopting the pay-per-view.

    “DSTV, GOTV will be reaping Nigerians if they consistently shunned the pay-per-view which could ameliorate the hardship being faced by the subscribers.”

    However, the Deputy Director, Research and Policy at the National Broadcasting Commission, Mr. Anete Onyebuchi, who represented the Director General, said the agency had no enabling law to either regulate or control the prices being charged by the cable television operators.

    Onyebuchi said: “There are negative reactions whenever MultiChoice incresases its price and the NBC is concerned.

    “However, the NBC Act only gives it power to receive, consider and investigate complaints regarding broadcast contents. Nowhere in the Act was the NBC given powers to regulate the prices being charged on their services.”

    He, therefore  urged the National Assembly to amend the NBC Act to give it powers to regulate prices in the industry.

    Onyebuchi nevertheless said the agency will continue to engage the operators in order to ensure sanity in the industry.

    The Director, Tax Policy and Advisory, Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Temitayo Orebajo, said the cable TV operators are concerned about making profits despite the harsh operational environment.

    He said: “The MultiChoice for instance, express fears that replacing monthly billing with pay-per view, will reduce their revenues.

    “However, the FIRS believe that the migration will not affect their income, rather they would get more subscribers.”

    Mr. Abubakar Ladan, who representated the Minister of Communications, Abubakar Ladan, also stressed the need to amend the NBC Act to enable the agency sanction erring Cable TV operators.

    He said: “We need to review the NBC Act in response to the dynamic and reality on ground, in the interest of the poor subscribers.”

    Ladan, who is the Director/ Secretary, Frequency Management Council, pledged that the ministry was doing everything to protect the interest of Nigerians.

    However, various stakeholders that made presentations before the panel, noted that the idea of pay per view being canvassed by the Senate was not feasible.

    They also explained that the current harsh environment which firms were operating under in Nigeria, was not making it possible for the firms to reduce their prices.

  • DSTV-GOtv Price Hike: Tribuna Orders MultiChoice To Produce Financial Report

    DSTV-GOtv Price Hike: Tribuna Orders MultiChoice To Produce Financial Report

    The tribunal on Tuesday, September 06, 2022, asked Ugbe to appear on September 8 with the company’s 2021 audited financial report.

    The three-member panel headed by Thomas Okosun, also ordered directors of the company to appear on the same date.

    What could happen: The officials may face sanctions for the alleged breach of a restraining order on DStv and GOtv tariff hike.

    Who dragged Multichoice to court: On July 25, the tribunal fixed today for judgment in the suit filed by Festus Onifade, a legal practitioner, and Coalition of Nigeria Consumers.

    Why Multichoice was taken to court: They had sued MultiChoice and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) after the company increased subscription prices on April 1, 2022.

    The litigants prayed the tribunal to stop the increment pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice dated and filed on March 30.

    Multichoice ignores court ruling: The tribunal granted the ex-parte motion, directing parties to maintain the status quo but MultiChoice implemented the new rates announced on March 30.

    What is going on now: In a motion on notice, the claimants urged the tribunal to invite the MD and the directors to explain why they should not be committed to prison for willful disobedience

    They also sought an order directing MultiChoice to pay 10 per cent of its annual turnover for failure to comply with the order in accordance with Section 51 (1) and 2 of the FCCPC Act, 2018.

    On April 11, the tribunal again ordered the company to revert to old prices by maintaining the status quo of its March 30 order, pending the hearing and determination of the matter.

    The Managing Director and directors of the 1st defendant (MultiChoice) are to appear before this honourable tribunal with certified true copies of their audited financial report of year 2021,” the panel ruled today.

    The tribunal said the report would enable it to determine “the appropriate penalty to impose on MultiChoice for being in contempt of the orders of this honourable tribunal made in March”.

    Section 51 of the CCPT Act states that upon conviction for contempt, a company is liable to pay a fine not less than “N100 million or 10 per cent of its turnover in the preceding year.”

    MultiChoice’s lawyer, Jamiu Agoro informed that Ugbe and others were out of Nigeria and might not be present on Thursday, September 08, 2022.

    Responding, the tribunal said those invited could be represented by other senior members of staff.

  • MultiChoice Wins Historic Copyright Suit Against Major Telcos

    MultiChoice Wins Historic Copyright Suit Against Major Telcos

    Some years ago when MultiChoice noticed that Safaricom and Jamii Telecom were livestreaming its sports content in Kenya without permission, the pay-TV giant sent them cease and desist notices. But the telcos failure to comply led to MultiChoice filing a legal suit which it has now won.

    A High Court in the East African country ordered the service providers to take down the football content, noting that they ought to have done so when MultiChoice served them notices prior to suing them in 2019. Both Safaricom and Jamii Telecom gave no lawful excuse as to why they failed to remove the pirated content. And following the latest ruling by the High Court, Safaricom had requested for more time to enable it comply. Meanwhile, MultiChoice welcomed the ruling. Business Daily quoted MultiChoice Kenya’s MD, Nancy Matimu, to have said.

    “We have been fighting for years to ensure that there are legal copyright protections and that those protections are enforced. The court has reaffirmed the stance of the law that copyright must be protected.”

    It should be noted that whereas regular subscribers to MultiChoice’s pay-TV packages incur monthly subscription fees, those streaming content online only incur data costs. The implication, therefore, is that MultiChoice loses out on profits whereas telcos sell more data and make extra profits.

    There are, at least, over 140 websites that currently host said pirated content. And even though the High Court had in 2020 temporarily ordered the sites to be suspended, Safaricom reportedly managed to suspend the decision by appealing before the Court of Appeal.

    Again, football-related content are at the centre of this controversy. Across Sub-Saharan Africa, European Super Cup, Championship & Europa Leagues, English Premier League and La Liga matches are widely watched by millions of fans. And MultiChoice has the exclusive right to broadcast the content.

    The company said it had invested heavily to be able to hold this broadcasting right. Therefore, any entity retransmitting these football matches without express authorisation from the pay-TV company is breaching its copyright.

     

    source: businessinsider

hacklink masterbetting masterbetting giriş masterbetting güncel giriş betoffice betoffice giriş betoffice güncel giriş galabet galabet giriş galabet güncel giriş casivera casivera giriş casivera güncel giriş vaycasino vaycasino giriş vaycasino güncel giriş betlike giriş betlike betlike güncel giriş atlasbet güncel giriş atlasbet giriş atlasbet güncel atlasbet trendbet trendbet giriş trendbet güncel trendbet trendbet giriş trendbet güncel trendbet güncel giriş betixir giriş betixir betixir güncel betixir güncel giriş betixir betixir güncel betixir giriş betixir güncel giriş wbahis wbahis giriş wbahis giriş wbahis güncel wbahis güncel giriş enbet enbet enbet giriş enbet güncel enbet güncel giriş enbet enbet giriş enbet güncel enbet güncel giriş casinolevant casinolevant giriş casinolevant güncel casinolevant güncel giriş casinolevant casinolevant giriş casinolevant güncel casinolevant güncel giriş setrabet setrabet giriş setrabet güncel setrabet güncel giriş setrabet setrabet giriş setrabet güncel setrabet güncel giriş tlcasino tlcasino giriş tlcasino güncel giriş masterbetting masterbetting giriş masterbetting güncel giriş royalbet royalbet giriş royalbet güncel betlike betlike giriş betlike güncel giriş betticket betticket giriş betticket güncel giriş betoffice betoffice giriş betoffice güncel giriş casival casival giriş casival güncel giriş casivera casivera giriş casivera güncel giriş vaycasino vaycasino giriş vaycasino güncel giriş enbet enbet giriş enbet güncel enbet güncel giriş enbet enbet giriş enbet güncel güncel casinolevant casinolevant giriş casinolevant güncel casinolevant güncel giriş casinolevant casinolevant giriş casinolevant güncel giriş wbahis wbahis giriş wbahis güncel wbahis güncel giriş wbahis wbahis giriş wbahis güncel giriş vidobet vidobet vidobet giriş vidobet güncel giriş vidobet güncel giriş vidobet güncel giriş vidobet vidobet giriş vidobet güncel vidobet güncel giriş betasus betasus giriş betasus güncel betasus güncel giriş betasus betasus giriş betasus güncel giriş betasus güncel betasus betasus giriş betasus güncel betasus güncel giriş betasus betasus giriş betasus güncel betasus güncel giriş tlcasino tlcasino giriş tlcasino güncel giriş galabet galabet giriş galabet güncel giriş wbahis wbahi giriş wbahis güncel wbahis güncel giriş wbahis wbahis giriş wbahis güncel wbahis güncel giriş betasus betasus giriş betasus güncel betasus güncel giriş betasus betasus giriş betasus giriş betasus güncel giriş betasus güncel tlcasino tlcasino giriş tlcasino güncel giriş betticket betticket giriş betticket güncel giriş betasus betasus giriş betasus güncel betasus güncel giriş betasus betasus giriş betasus güncel betasus güncel giriş betlike betlike giriş betlike güncel giriş royalbet royalbet giriş royalbet güncel giriş masterbetting masterbetting giriş masterbetting güncel giriş casinolevant casinolevant giriş casinolevant güncel giriş casival casival giriş casival güncel giriş pashagaming pashagaming giriş pashagaming güncel giriş atlasbet atlasbet giriş atlasbet güncel atlasbet güncel giriş atlasbet atlasbet giriş atlasbet güncel atlasbet güncel giriş